QUESTIONS AS A REFLECTION OF STUDENTS' THINKING SKILLS IN INDONESIAN LANGUAGE EDUCATION LECTURES WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF AI-BASED APPLICATIONS
Abstract
The problem formulations that will be studied include: (a) the form of questions based on the question words used, (b) the variety of questions based on the number of components, and (c) the level of thinking reflected in student questions. This study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The study was conducted at the Indonesian Language Education (PBI) lecture at the State University of Malang. The subjects of the study were students who took PBI lectures and used AI-based applications in the learning process. The results of this study indicate that students use question forms using the question words what, why, how, when, why, and the clitic -kah. In addition, a variety of student questions were also found based on the number of components, namely one, two, three, and four components. Third, a variety of levels of thinking contained in student questions were found, there are four levels, namely understanding, analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L. W. (Ed.). (2009). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged ed., [Nachdr.]). Longman.
Baldwin, M. S., Beltran, R. O., & Chernobilsky, E. (2004). Enhancing Thinking Through Problem-based Learning Approaches: International Perspectives. Thomson Learning.
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning. Book Excerpt. George Lucas Educational Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539399
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (Nachdr.). Longman.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed). Continuum.
Hindra Kurniawan, Adiguna Sasama W.U, & Tambunan, R. W. (2024). Potensi AI dalam Meningkatkan Kreativitas dan Literasi dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. JAMI: Jurnal Ahli Muda Indonesia, 5(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.46510/jami.v5i1.285
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational technology: A primer for the 21st century. Springer.
Keraf, G. (1980). Komposisi: Sebuah pengantar kemahiran bahasa. Nusa Indah.
Moleong, L. J. (1989). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remadja Karya.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). The Art of Socratic Questioning. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Postgraduate Student at Universitas Negeri Malang, and Biology Education Department Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu, Indonesia, aprizafitriani@umb.ac.id, Fitriani, A., Zubaidah, S., Prof., Biology Department, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia, siti.zubaidah.fmipa@um.ac.id, Susilo, H., Prof., Biology Department, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia, herawati.susilo.fmipa@um.ac.id, Al Muhdhar, M. H. I., & Prof., Biology Department, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia, mimien.henie.fmipa@um.ac.id. (2020). PBLPOE: A Learning Model to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Scientific Attitudes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1327a
Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Fourth edition) (with Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J.). (2020). SAGE.
Xia, Y., Shin, S.-Y., & Kim, J.-C. (2024). Cross-Cultural Intelligent Language Learning System (CILS): Leveraging AI to Facilitate Language Learning Strategies in Cross-Cultural Communication. Applied Sciences, 14(13), 5651. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135651
Yulianti, Suryanti, N. M. N., & Sukardi. (2021). Application of the Google ClassroomAssisted Blended-Inquiry Method on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(6).
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_1
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISCE Journal indexed by:
ISCE : Journal of Innovative Studies on Character and Education
Institute Superior Cristal (ISC) Dili, East Timor
ISSN : 2523-613X (media online)
ISCE : Journal of Innovative Studies on Character and Education is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
View ISCE Journal Stats