AN ANALYSIS POETRY OF SACRAL HOUSE INAUGURATION IN DIROMA VILLAGE OF LURO LAUTEM MUNICIPALITY
Abstract
This study was a phenomenological study based on the lived experience of poetry Kirata Lolo. Through five informants, the study found that the meaning of the poetry Kirata Lolo was a symbol of spirituality used to inaugurate the traditional house of Luahira Maluhira in Diroma village became a sacral house. The function of the poetry kirana lolo was an instrument of communication between humans and nature. The poetry Kirata Lolo is a traditional law that justifies or governs the habitual action of everyday life. The Positive impact of using poetry Kirata Lolo to get blessings from the spirits and ancestors’ souls arrived at that sacral house. The negative impact on the lives of people in Diroma either faced big risks or underwent various natural disasters; the husband and wife could not give birth and suffered death. The poetry Kirata Lolo has an important role in teaching us to respect each other, live in harmony, be friendly, and create unity, and stability to avoid bad action.
References
Anderson, B. et.al. (1972). Sociological theories in progress. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Arbuthnot, J. (1735). Tables of ancient coins.
Arthur W. C. and Stephen C. E. (1993). Education identity.
Backer, D. (2007). Network society: Theory culture and society. Zeppelin University.
Baecker, D. (1997). Systems bracketing culture.
Bell, C. (1992). Ritual theory ritual practice. Oxford University Press, Inc.
Bourdieu. (1989). The aristocracy of culture. USA: University of Georgia Press.
Brooks, G. (1996). Poetry also has three types of poems: lyric of poetry writers expresses their thoughts and feelings about a subject in a brief but musical way: the norton anthology of poetry. Fourth Edition. E-book
Browning, R. (2007). Poetry modern essays in criticism and interpretations of poems. University of North Carolina.
Caitlin Morneau Redemption and Restoration: A Catholic Perspective Justice
Carruth, H. (2013). The poetry. University of Michigan Press.
Christina, A. (2018). Poems for special moments.
Collesano, E. (2017). Society of the sacred heart. United States-Canada: RSCJ and Ruth.
Constitution of Republic Democratic Timor Leste. (2002).
Cunnings, NSCJ. e Catholic Mobilizing Network in partnership with the Precious Blood Ministry of Reconciliation.
Douglas N. and Beran, H. The function of poetry: a survey of critical theory.
Durkheim. (1982). The rules of sociological method. London: Palgrave.
Eliot, T.S. (2015). The social function of poetry.
Elliott, E. (2007). The selected poetry. University of Sheffield.
Elliott, E. (2019). The poetical works. Florida: University of South Florida.
Essay, D. (2013). Philosophical essays on mind and psychology.
Frost, R. (1955). Poetry: the kind of thing poets write.
Gennep, A. v. (1909). Investigated formal structures in ritual.
Goffman, E. (2016). Rituals as interaction in sociological terms. University of Chicago.
Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Canada: Batoche Books Kitchener.
Mill, J. S. (1980). Educative democracy. Oxford Univ. Press for the Univ. of Hull.
Parsons, T. (1977). The evolution of societies: theory of societies community.
Pereita, S. (2017). That culture is a complex totality that Includes knowledge, beliefs, art, morals, lows, customs and capabilities and other habits. ISLLAC (2017. p. 121)
Pickering and Hoeper. (1990). Poetry: an introduction.
Reaske, C. (1982). How to analyse poetry. Monarch Press.
Ruohomaa and Star, B. (1912). Poetry: a magazine of verse. Chicago.
Strauss, L. (1950). Socilogie et anthropoloie. introduction à l'oeuvre de marcel mauss. Presses Universitaires de France.
Tambiah, S. (1985). Culture thought and social action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The Norton Anthology of Poetry. (1996). The types of poetry (Fourth Edition).
Wordsworth, W. (1802). Poetry analyses of London.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.