TEACHING VOCABULARY THROUGH BINGO GAME

José Sarmento, Joaninha da Costa Freitas, Charles F. Guterres, Ilidio Ximenes Moreira, Sebastiao Moreira

Abstract


The objectives of the study are to describe the use of bingo games in teaching English Vocabulary, and the differences between before and after the implementation of teaching English Vocabulary through the Bingo Game. The method used to conduct the research was Classroom Action Research which was implemented through; plan, action, observation, and reflection. The result of the study was analyzed and described that there were some significant differences between before and after the implementation of teaching English Vocabulary through Bingo Game because the pre-test was 5.2 and the post-test was 7.5. The differences between pre-and post-test scores were calculated through the t-test score was 19.4 which was greater than the score of t-table was 2.043. The level of significance is 0.05 with the degree of freedom (df) = n-1=30-1=29 that could meet the t-table was 2.043. So, it is indicated that the Bingo game is considered an innovative strategy to teach English vocabulary. The English teachers and students were suggested to teach English vocabulary as a Foreign language through Bingo is very helpful for learners to memorize the vocabulary very fast. This strategy could make students more enjoyable and make it easy to memorize vocabulary.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Altenburg Evelyn P. and Robert M. Virgo (2010) English Grammar. Understanding the basics. New York: Cambridge University press

Ansell, M. (2000). Free English Grammar second edition. Hughes Baric. (1993) The penguin working words: an Australian; guide to modern English usage. Australia; Penguin Book Australia LTD.

Angela Coco, ET, al, “Bingo for beginners: A game strategy for facilitating action learning” Vole 29, Nu,4.

Baskerville, W.M. and Sewell J. W ( 2004). An English grammar. ( e-book ) available at: http: /// W. W. W, Scribed com/ document / 290728883/ an – English grammar –w- Baskerville- and- J. M- Sewell ( accessed 15 ague. 2019).

Douglas, T. (2000). Principle of language learning and teaching English words Cliffs: Addison Wesley Longman,, Inc.

Douglas ; ( 2004 p, 4 ). An analysis of grammar New York; Praeger.

Eastward, John ( 2002 ). Oxford guide to English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University, press.

Huddleston, Rodney, plum, K. Geoffrey ( 2005). A student’s introduction to English grammar, Cambridge University Press.

Hamilton Elaine and Rid out ( 1982). Effective English book 3, Malaysia: Longman Cheshire

Hornsby A.S ( 1987, [p. 574). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of Current English. (Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hadfield, Jill. ( 1990, p. 4. ). Elementary grammar games.London: Longman LTD

J. S, Richardson, and Morgan R.F. ( 2007 ) Reading to learn in the content areas. Belmont, CA. Cengage learning.

Murphy, R. ( 1994; p. 138). Intermediate English grammar: preference and practice for South Asian students: Cambridge University Press.

Marcella frank ( 1972 p.6-7). Modern English: practice.

Murphy R. ( 1990; p, 138). Essential grammar in using a reference and practice book for elementary students. Cambridge: University Press.

Murphy R. ( 1990; p, 138 ). Essential grammar in using a reference and practice book for elementary students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Police, code of the District of Columbia, (August 12, 2014, p. 16)

Remkotroncon, fun classroom activity, ( Nov, 24,2014, p.

Sergeant, howard( 2007). Basic English grammar for English language learners; Singapore: saddleback educational publishing.

Swiss, institute of comparative law. ( 2006 p.7) study of gambling services in the internal market of the European Union. Lausanne: Swiss institute of comparative law.

Thomson A.J. ( 1987 p. 25 ). And A. V Martinet, A Practical English grammar, London: Oxford University Press.

Walker Elaine and Steve Ellsworth ( 2000). New grammar practice: for pre-intermediate students. Person education.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.