TEACHER MOTIVATION AND CREATIVITY TOWARDS STUDENT LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT AT ENSINO SECUNDARIO GERAL PÚBLICO HATO-UDO, AINARO- TIMOR LESTE

Agostinho dos Santos Gonçalves, Sebastião Pereira, Ilidio Ximenes Moreira, Jaimito Tilman

Abstract


In an educational institution, learning achievement is an important
indicator to measure the success of the teaching and learning process.
Learning achievement is influenced by many factors that are generally
grouped into internal and external factors, including teacher factors, in
this case, teacher motivation and teacher creativity. The objectives of
this study were 1) To determine and analyze the significant influence
between teacher motivation and creativity partially on learning
achievement in class II IPS students at Ensino Secundário Geral
Público Hato-Udo; 2) To identify and analyze the significant influence
between teacher motivation and creativity simultaneously on learning
achievement in class II IPS students at Ensino Secundário Geral
Público Hato-Udo; 3) To determine and analyze the variables of
teacher motivation and creativity that have a dominant influence on
learning achievement in class II IPS students at Ensino Secundário
Geral Público Hato-Udo. This research is quantitative research with a
sample of 49 students of class II IPS by distributing questionnaires to
respondents. After that, the data were analyzed using multiple linear
regression analysis techniques with the help of the SPSS program.
Where, the results showed that the motivation and creativity of
teachers simultaneously had a significant effect on learning
achievement with the value of Fcount = 12,330> from the value of
Ftable = 2.80. Besides, teacher motivation and creativity partially affect
learning achievement because the value of tcount for learning
motivation is obtained = 2,575, and teacher creativity is 2,825 with ttable value of = 1,678. So, the t-count value of the two variables is
greater than the ttable. Thus, of the two variables of learning
motivation and teacher creativity the most dominant influence on
learning achievement in Ensino Secudario Geral Público Hato -Udo is Teacher Creativity where the correlation coefficient of learning
motivation (X1) on learning achievement (Y) is 0.486 and teacher
creativity ( X2) to the Learning Achievement variable (Y) of 0.911 with
multiple linear regression prices Y = 6.175 + 0.262 X1 + 0.420X2.
Meanwhile, the correlation coefficient of the two variables of Learning
Motivation and Teacher Creativity on Learning Achievement is 0.591
and the determinant coefficient (Rsquare) is 0.349 or 34.9% and the
remaining 65.1% is influenced by other factors.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (1997). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka

Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penenlitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rhineka

Cipta

Djamarah, S.B. (1994). Prestasi Belajar dan Kompentensi Guru. Surabaya : Usaha

Nasional

Djamarah, S. B. (2000). Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta

Djamarah, S.B. & Zain, A. (2010). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Gagne, R.M. (1985). The Condition of Learning Theory of Instruction. New York:

Rinehart.

Hadi, S. (2007). Penelitian Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset

Hamalik, O. (2002). Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sistem. Jakarta: PT.

Bumi Aksara

Hamdani. (2011). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Hawadi, R. A., dkk. (2001). Kreatifitas Belajar. Dapat diakses pada

http://www.google.com/. Diakses tanggal 7 November 2012.

Jamaluddin, N. (1978). Pengertian Guru. Diakses melalui situr http://google.com

dengan situs http://digilib.uinsby.ac.id/16364/1/Bab%202.pdf

Muhammad, A. (2004). Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru

Algesindo

Mulyasa, E. (2008). Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan

Menyenangkan. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Moreira, I. X. (2011). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi dan Karya Ilmiah. Dili: Instituto

Superior Cristal

Nasution, N. (1991). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Purwanto, N. (2002). Ilmu Pendidikan Teoritis dan Praktis. Bandung: Remaja. Karya.

República Democrática de Timor-Leste. (2003). Constituição República Democrática de

Timor-Leste. Díli - Timor-Leste: Tribunal de Recurso.

Sardiman, A.M. (2000). Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sardiman, A.M. (2003). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja.

Grafindo Persada.

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Sudjana, N. (2008). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru

Algesindo.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D cetakan ke 14 Anggota

IKAPI. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta

Widyaningsih, S.Y.; Haryono; & Saputro, S. (2012). Model MFI Dan Pogil Ditinjau Dari

Aktivitas Belajar Dan Kreativitas Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar. Jurnal Inkuiri

ISSN: 2252-7893, Vol 1, No 3 http://jurnal.pasca.uns.ac.id. Program Studi

Pendidikan Sains, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Wijaya, C. (1991). Kemampuan Dasar Guru Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung :

PT Remaja Rosda karya.

Wijaya, C. & Rusyan, T. (1991). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Rosda Karya

Winkel, W.S. (1996). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.