Cesario Maia dos Santos Guterres, Jose Antonio Sarmento, Sebastião Pereira


The study used qualitative in Classroom Action Research method which was
conducted at the To The First Grade Students of EBC Santa Maria Goreti in The
School Year 2018 in order to find the solution and answer the following
statement of the problems (1) does dialogue develop the students’ speaking
skills? (2) are there any significance differences between before and after the
implementation of teaching dialogue to develop speaking skills? The samples of
study were 16 students by First Grade Students Of Ebc Santa Maria Goreti In
The School Year 2018 in the school year 2018. The test was one set of Speaking
which was administered the students pre-test and post-test.The result of the pretest and post-test were compared and analyzed that the mean score of the pre-test
is 5.5 which is difference with the mean score of post-test is 7.7. These
significance differences between pre-test and post-test are indicated that the
dialogue is an useful strategy that can be used to teach English speaking skill in
the class in order to develop the students speaking skill in the school as the
foreign language acquisition.Other words, it can perhaps be seen in the
comparison between tha T-calculation is 10.8 ≥ T table is 2.120 at the level of
significant 0.5.Therefore, it is interpreted that there are some significance
defferences between before and after the implementation teaching English as a
foreign language by using dialogue to develop the students’ English speaking
skill. Based on the classroom observation, the process of teaching and learning
English speaking by using dialogue method was going smoothly and the most of
the students were enthusiastic. This strategy of dialogue can be considered one
of the enjoyable activities for the students in teaching and learning process in the
class. It could also bring possitive effect for the teacher and students in the class
to avoid the violence because the students could evoke among others feeling
through the dialogue to express their ideas without worrying and happy to
interact wiht pairs spontaneuolsy. Lastly, the local English teachers and students
are recommended that dialogue is an alternative solution to avoid the violence in
learning that occurs at class between teachers and students and also among the
students. The dialogue activity, the students could develop their social skill
together and effficent and effective communicative language skills.

Full Text:



Alwasila, A.C. (2006). Pokoknya Sunda: Interpretasi untuk aksi. Bandung: PT

Kiblat buku utama.

Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive Approach to

Language Pedagogy (2nd.). New York: Adisson Wesley Longman, Inc.

Burns, A. & Joeyce, H. (1997). Focus on Speaking. Sydney:Maquire University

Press. Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary, 1994:1526.

Depdiknas. (2006). Standar isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah:

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No. 22 Tahun 2006. Jakarta

Direktorat Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Gebhard, J.G. (2000). Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language: A

Teacher Self-Development and Methodology Guide. Ann Arbor: The

University of Michigan Press.

Huang, I. Y. (2008). Role Play for ESL/EFL Children in the English Classroom.

Retrieved September 26th, 2008 from: The Internet TESL Journal, vol.

XIV, No. 2, February 2008 ( HuangRolePlay.html).

Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Researh Planner. Victoria:

Deaken University Press.

Lado, R. (1964). Language Teaching: A Scientific Approach. New York.

McGraw-Hill, inch.

Lestary, L. A. (2000). Permainan Bahasa: Salah Satu Alternative untuk

mengaktifkan Siswa Berbicara dalam Bahasa Ingrish. Jurnal Genteng Kali

Edisi IV. Jawa Timur: Proyek Perluasan dan Peningkatan Mutu SLTP

Kanwil DIKBUD.

Nunan, D. (1992). Designing Task for the communicative Classroom. Sidney:

Cambridge University Press.

O’Malley, j. M., & Pierce, L.V. (1996). Authentic Assessment for English

Language Learner: Pratical Approach for Teacher. Massachusetts:


Richard-Amato, P. A. (2003). Making It Happen: from interactive to

participatory Language Teaching: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. New

York: Longman.

Siwu, M. (2005). Improving the Students’ Speaking Skill of SLTPN Manado by

Using Role-Play. Unplubished Thesis. Malng: Graduate Program, State

University of Malang.

Valette, R.M. & Disick, R.S. (1972). Modern Language Performance Objectives

and Individualization. New York: Hacourt Brace Javanovich, Inc.

Wonglehka, F. (2010). English Development for Thai Children to ASEAN and

Global Arena. Retrieved July 15, 2012, from

Khaemanee,T.(2011) Teaching Science.: Knowledge for Effective Learning

Process. First Edition Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Harmer, J. (1991). The Practice of English Language Teachimg. Essex: Longman

Group UK Limited.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISCE indexed by:


ISCE : Journal of Innovative Studies on Character and Education
Institute Superior Cristal (ISC)

ISSN : 2523-613X (Online)